| ▲ | Introduction to Atom(validator.w3.org) |
| 40 points by susam 5 hours ago | 8 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | mplanchard 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I hand-rolled an atom feed for my statically generated blog. It’s a reasonable, easy format to work with. |
|
| ▲ | intrasight 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| First iteration of Google's APIs were atom. I do miss XML. |
| |
| ▲ | abustamam an hour ago | parent [-] | | One of the API providers I use at work returns responses in XML and we use an XML parser to parse it to JSON and even then it's not perfect. What do you like about XML? I feel like I'm missing something. |
|
|
| ▲ | perrohunter 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| what is old is new again? |
| |
| ▲ | hnlmorg 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, this is just old. Pity though. RSS / Atom was a fantastic concept and it’s a real pity big tech killed them off. | | |
| ▲ | rambambram 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Nothing is killed. It still exists, it's an open protocol after all. And I choose to use it, it's pretty fun to calmly follow around 2000 feeds from - mostly - blogs from HN. And cars... I need my car blogs. | | |
| ▲ | geodel 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Agreed. That nowadays people or even big companies find it outside their core competency to host their blog, have atom/RSS feeds is not because big tech killing it. |
| |
| ▲ | bawolff 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Meh. Big tech didnt kill it off, it was already dead at that point. Sometimes things just arent popular no matter how much we might want it to be. |
|
|