Given the latest court ruling in March that AI works can't be copyrighted, this makes a lot of sense. The movie itself can't be copyrighted if it uses AI (although there is still some unresolved issues around how much AI).

▲

chungusamongus 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Hah, no. Just because AI was employed in the production to some extent doesn't mean it can't be copyrighted. It is not so black and white. You are not describing the situation accurately.

	▲	jedberg 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I literally said: "although there is still some unresolved issues around how much AI" Which is really the crux of the issue.

▲

SilverElfin an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I would expect that ruling to be overturned at some point. AI is going to be how people work. And saying it can the copyrighted is going to look increasingly absurd, like saying anything produced with Adobe tools can’t be copyrighted.

	▲	jedberg an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I actually agree with you. Between lobbying from the AI companies, artists when they realize it's a tool they can use to enhance their own work, and probably the movie makers themselves when the realize how much their own people want to use it, it will either be overturned or the laws will be much clearer.