Sentences 5 and 6 of the article, top of the second paragraph:

> That move is Phish fans in miniature. Someone cared enough about the song and the bit that they rebuilt a piece of pop culture around the band.

▲

dgellow 4 hours ago | parent [-]

That doesn’t really clarify

▲

Arainach 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It explicitly says "the band". All the context in the first paragraphs is about the music. It absolutely clarifies. The rest of the article talks about listening to the music, watching them (or wanting to watch them) in concert or in tour.

Read the article. Or just look at the top search result for Phish. Stop being lazy.

	▲	emil-lp 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I literally read the entire article without understanding that Phish is a band. Call me lazy if you will. You could also have chosen to just say they're a band and recommend me a record to listen to. Something something 1 in 10'000.
	▲	dr_kretyn 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I re read that paragraph a few times hoping that I missed something. Then gave up and went on to find the answer in comments. I thought the author was describing some feeling, or maybe some action. That "that to me" isn't clear with "that".