| ▲ | hansmayer 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
:) Here is a crazy thought - what if we had some kind of a narrowed down, specific subset of normal language which would translate into specific computer-level instructions. So for example, instead of telling computer to read something from a file and transform it in a certain way, you actually had a specific instruction to open a file, which worked the same each time you used it and guaranteed to fail if you used it the wrong way? Wow, the possibilities are endless :) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wiseowise 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Don’t be ridiculous, that would be extremely hard. Oppressive even, because it’s unattainable to an average person. And it is, otherwise there would be millions of programmers in the world. Was it unattainable or “we have to pay these suckers money, and they have rights and lives outside of work”? Bah! Just make sure to renew your subscription, agent will do the thinking and you bring the money. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | woolion 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
[flagged] | |||||||||||||||||||||||