Bitwarden have in my opinion is one of the BEST business models a user can ask for.

It's open-source, and I can self-host (100% free) and the free version is really, really good too, and then a premium version is $20/year which is very reasonably priced.

Also for cloud hosted password manager, you're always going to have attacks no matter what, but at least they are transparent about it .. (unlike say LastPass, Norton LifeLock, Keeper and possibly others). For self-hosting it might be better security, solely because no one cares to attack it, but it's not going to be more secure form engineering best practices POV (but again I might be wrong .. I'm not a security engineer of any kind)

▲

Flockster 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

As a now almost 15 year long user (crazy to think about) of 1password I am unsure what attacks do you mean? Did passwords get lost and it was not disclosed or what did you mean by the lack of transparency?

	▲	SamDc73 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That is my bad; I was thinking of LastPass[1] where it took them months to fully disclose and explain a very serious breach of data. 1Password seem to have a good transparency track record (I edited the original comment) [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34097142

▲

lyu07282 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I also don't really expect the self-hosted version to be a small self-contained go binary or something, they have millions of users their tech stack is going to be more complicated necessarily. But then vaultwarden exists too and is well maintained but is then somehow also inadequate. Who could possibly live up these unreasonable standards?