| ▲ | princevegeta89 15 hours ago | |||||||
Well, I know Bitwarden is pretty demanding and also not so straightforward to do self-hosting. But we have Vaultwarden which is ridiculously easy to deploy and also very lightweight while being immensely popular; has never had any major security incidents so far - and it has thousands of eyes on it for every single commit. I've been hosting this for three years now and I have never had a single problem with it. always worked with my Bitwarden clients on all of my devices. So if you would like to, try Vaultwarden. | ||||||||
| ▲ | muppetman 15 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
You could have just posted "I didn't read the article" instead of this comment. It specifically addresses vaultwarden quite a number of times. | ||||||||
| ||||||||