"probably" according to what? Just producing a possible decomposition of a graph and arbitrarily assigning meaning to the components is rationalization, not empirical inquiry.

▲

clickety_clack 12 hours ago | parent [-]

It’s about as empirical as the chart everyone sees that describes the effect, and as rationalizations go it seems like a plausible one.

▲

mwkaufma 12 hours ago | parent [-]

How does it become more "plausible" just by doing number-wang absent one iota of external confirmation? It's a tautology.

	▲	peterlk 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Thanks for numberwang today. Probably my favorite meme for board meetings and all-hands presentations