So, Andrew Tate videos would be blocked for talking about male gender roles? I don’t understand why we are replacing “LGBT Content” with “Gender Content” in formal vocabulary.

▲

sdsd 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Most conservative Christians (at least the ones I know in LDS and evangelical circles) would be very uncomfortable with their kids watching Andrew Tate videos, yes.

▲

ceejayoz 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Their voting records don’t seem to bear that theory out.

▲

spwa4 2 hours ago | parent [-]

One of the central tenets of democracy is that NOBODY knows anyone else's voting records. Even politicians are not allowed to reveal who they're voting for (meaning they can't show the paper. They can talk about it afterwards, but for all you know e.g. Trump voted for Harris).

I've always known people involved with the Christian community to be opposed against all extreme political parties, left and right (and long ago against anarchists, mostly against greens, ...). If they are rightist, they won't be nearly far enough right to support Andrew Tate and the like.

You don't know and can't know if being Christian and voting rightist overlaps or not. Only the general area is known. Nothing more.

	▲	ceejayoz 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I don’t know how you voted. I know how your neighborhood did; I know how evangelicals (and Asians and Jews and people in certain age and income brackets and dozens of other data points) voted. The more evangelical an area, the more it voted for Trump. We know this.

▲

2ndorderthought 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It sounds less bigoted. It's not less bigoted. It sounds that way though.

▲

lowmagnet an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because they even conflate pronouns with gender issues. You know, the words that substitute for antecedents in conversation.

▲

3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]