| ▲ | esafak 5 hours ago |
| Or isn't it? You are one step away from deploying superficially impressive things, without understanding what is lacking. |
|
| ▲ | nilirl 5 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Yes, lacking for the expert. To the non-expert, probably acceptable, even impressive. |
| |
| ▲ | esafak 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | That is precisely my point. The non-expert won't know what is missing and will be impressed, and there might be a price to pay. How would you like to trust your data to my vibe coded database, safety to my vibe coded mechanical designs, and health to my vibed up diagnosis? | | |
| ▲ | nilirl 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | What I'd said: it just feels like so much harder for a human's design to feel valuable now I'm talking about competition; being valuable within a market; being seen as useful by others. Maybe my focus on competition wasn't well communicated but you're making a precise but irrelevant point about personal integrity. | | |
| ▲ | esafak 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe I misunderstood. I agree that not all buyers may appreciate the difference, and experts should educate them. Sometimes the price of their ignorance will educate them too. |
|
|
|
