| ▲ | Wurdan 11 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The business model works fundamentally differently in the US and Europe due to geography. The US is big, meaning that flights are often longer, meaning that fuel is a bigger portion of the operating cost. And fuel is essentially something airlines can’t reduce the cost of compared to other operating costs where it might be possible to optimize for greater efficiency. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gib444 10 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> meaning that flights are often longer Got any sources? I found: Europe average flight length (2024): 1,157km [0] USA average flight length (I could only find old data, 2005): 1,110km [1] (even if we index this up based on upward trends, maybe another 150km, that doesn't seem a huge difference to me?) > The US is big And Europe is big too. It's actually a bit bigger than the USA by land size. Btw, IAG is a global airline group. Only ~32% of IAGs revenue is intra-Europe and domestic. Another data point: Turkish Airlines (very long-haul focused airline) 2025 net income margin was 12.1% in 2025. I'm not sure your explanation is sufficient. I don't see the exception in the USA? I am certainly willing to accept there are other differences and challenges in the USA, but I don't think it's been presented yet in this discussion. And remember the original claim was "Airlines are not great business. Margins are not great" -- EDIT: I found https://www.airportroutes.com/airlines/NKS/ which does highlight that Spirit flew lengths longer compared to Europe's average, at 1,577 km - but then using the same source for Ryanair https://www.airportroutes.com/airlines/RYR/ it's 1,456km, so again, not a huge difference. So comparing 2 seemingly very similar airlines, the European one has both managed to be profitable and not go bankrupt... -- [0] https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/eurocontrol-data-sna... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||