| ▲ | LiamPowell 7 hours ago | |||||||
Last I checked they weren't really any quieter than their competitors at the same airflow and pressure (which is a little subjective because your curve will never match perfectly). They do have a really low number on their specs because they have a really low max RPM, but that's not really relevant when you can just lower the speed of other fans. They're still really good fans, but a lot of this is just marketing. At max power the Noctua NF-A12x25 has 56 CFM and 2.3 mmAq for 31dBA [1]. At 70% the Artic A12 Pro is 56 CFM, 4.3 mmAq, and 31dBA [2]. At 60% the Asus ProArt PF120 is 61 CFM, 2.6 mmAq, and 30 dBA [3]. Note that the ProArt is a bit thicker (25 vs 30 mm) and all these dBA numbers are almost certainly unobstructed airflow. The Noctua is certainly good, but it's literally over 5× the price of the Artic. [1]: https://www.cybenetics.com/evaluations/fans/4/ | ||||||||
| ▲ | sho_hn 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
On the other hand, if I recall right the internet is rife with customer reports of the Arctic fans having noose spikes / unpleasant hums or resonances at certain RPMs. Lots of people using config tuning to avoid it. I ended up buying Pure Wings as mentioned. Also much cheaper than Noctua and seemingly not having those issues. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | techpression 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Noctua is working at the last five percentages of performance AND lifespan. They want their fans to perform (and sound) identical ten years later with daily use. Most people change fans far earlier than that. It’s kind of refreshing to see really. | ||||||||
| ||||||||