> Why is the camera there in the first place??

I was attacked by "a good dog" and then blamed for provoking the dog (like that is valid excuse for starting an attack). I defended myself, and dog owner joined the attacked together with their dog!

After that, I have cameras everywhere, I even record many interactions on my phone. I refuse to be at mercy of random beasts and their "owners". If people start using leashes and muzzles, I may consider taking down cameras!

▲

collingreen 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What does this have to do with cameras covering little kids doing gymnastics?

I'm sorry you had a bad experience and using cameras to protect yourself is a thing but filming kids doing gymnastics seems very very far from purely defensive.

▲

throw848tjfj 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Because predators are even at schools! Our school gym park is used as a toilet by dog owners!

I want to have video evidence, if some crazy person blames kid for provoking the attack!

	▲	dghlsakjg 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		That’s understandable. Why does the video footage need to be able to be viewed live, remotely, by a sales team and a prospective client in another state? Predators have access to these cameras. There are numerous instances of police using these systems to stalk women. If I want video proof of what happened at a school, I’m much more comfortable with it being held on premises in a tamper evident location. That eliminates some of the predators from the situation.
	▲	ashtonshears an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Your trauma is not reason to prescribe privacy invasion on others

▲

throw848tjfj 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]