| ▲ | baby_souffle 10 hours ago |
| Is there some argument to aid here that this constitutes or facilitates systemic harassment? Or is that just going to be nigh on impossible to use as grounds for a lawsuit? |
|
| ▲ | LocalH 10 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Even if there are grounds for a lawsuit, chances are "qualified immunity" will mean the wronged parties get zero recompense |
| |
| ▲ | garciasn 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Go after Flock; they are not protected by extension as they are the ones who are alerting the police and have no system-wide removal option according to the Chief interviewed. | | |
| ▲ | gwerbin 7 minutes ago | parent [-] | | They're going to say it's the police's fault for not double checking the AI recommendation, or something like that. Privatization primarily serves to launder responsibility. |
|
|
