While the tread is swapping between "OMG Claude good. OpenAI was done for" and "OMG Codex good. Anthropic was done for". I've never heard about Gemini and Grok. It works mostly similar performance, but people don't mention that much.

Still, my impression is, Gemini hallucinate too much while Grok is always less capable than competitors so it's not worth using it.

▲

margalabargala an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Gemini is the best model for OCR bar none.

It absolutely sucks at coding.

▲

kardianos 42 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Gemini 2.5 and 3 can code, but they are also dumb. They don't model the world well. It's hard to use them for programming tasks.

I haven't tried grok4.2 or grok4.3 yet for coding, but it wasn't up to the challenge as an agent yet. It looks like grok4.3 shifted its training and operates always as an agent first judging on some web usage. Musk knows grok is behind and states it publically. Now with grok4.3 release I do plan to try it again to see if it is suitable.

	▲	WarmWash 22 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Gemini weakness is coding, but it will go toe to toe with 5.5 for science, (classic) engineering, finance, basically not programming stuff. It also does it while using about 1/4 the tokens.