[flagged]

mapontosevenths 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Elon publicaly claimed he had never corresponded with Epstein. that was a lie.

When the documents were released they found several like thie one below. Saying things like "What day/night will be the wildest party on =our island?" [0]

The "our" part is especially interesting as it implies he didnt just visit, but had an ownership stake.

Other emails were found with Epstein making excuses to avoid having Musk visit, and Musks own child publically stated that the emails were authentic and aligned with her memory of the events. [1]

[0] https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01762...

[1] https://www.threads.com/@vivllainous/post/DUMBh2Vkk8D?xmt=AQ...

▲

user34283 an hour ago | parent [-]

My searches have not turned up a result showing that Musk "claimed he had never corresponded with Epstein".

Can you source this? If not, can you explain why you did not check it before you posted the inaccurate claim?

▲

mikeyouse an hour ago | parent [-]

At minimum Musk repeatedly claimed that Epstein was the one reaching out trying to get Musk to visit his island, when in reality Musk was the one initiating and asking which nights would be the wildest parties. And after making plans to visit with his then-wife, when Epstein warned him that the ratio of women-to-men might upset Musk’s wife, Musk told Epstein it wouldn’t be a problem.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/30/elon-musk...

Musk has a long history of accusations (see the “I’ll buy you a horse” SpaceX lawsuit) as well as having fathered numerous children with women ~25 years younger than himself so not sure why you’d want to die on this particular hill.

	▲	user34283 3 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I never heard about the horse related thing, that’s interesting, thanks. A long history? Another search tells me that apart from the mentioned accusation, there is only one WSJ article alleging sexual conduct with SpaceX employees. You asked why I take Musk‘s side in these discussions; it’s because I don’t think he’s a pedophile. Nothing I‘ve seen seemed convincing to me, and the arguments made online often were so laughably inaccurate and exaggerated as to border on blatant slander.