| ▲ | denkmoon 3 hours ago | |
I get that the connectors are identical but I find it odd that people find it so challenging. Thunderbolt is the thick and short cable. If it's not thick it's not gonna work well and if it's over a metre it's not gonna work well. cf my pile of thin long "basic" usb c cables. | ||
| ▲ | wallst07 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
How do you define "thick" or "short" to a non-engineer/tech person? Relative to what exactly? | ||
| ▲ | consp 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Thunderbolt 4 passive (over usb) is 0.8m in length, longer cables are active, up to two meters I think, so they do exist. | ||
| ▲ | zimpenfish 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Great, and what about non-Thunderbolt cables? How do I distinguish between power only, USB 2, USB 2+PD, and USB 3.2 cables? I've got a whole pile of cables that, without my Treedix tester, are indistinguishable re: functionality and support. | ||