[flagged]

2ndorderthought 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's what it was doing. Like literally. Chatgpt it or Google it. Supporting grok is paying money to a csam generator.

Edit I cannot reply to the post below me. I have gone entirely over to local models so I am paying zero dollars to any of the us defense contractors that are also tech companies. It's awesome.

	▲	pixel_popping 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[flagged]
	▲	pixel_popping 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[flagged]

▲

khalic 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Grok was used to create CSAM

▲

pixel_popping 5 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

spiderfarmer 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Musk partied with Epstein.

▲

pixel_popping 5 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

tclancy 4 hours ago | parent [-]

What’s the correlation between people defending Musk, Twitter and kiddie diddlers?

▲

pixel_popping 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't know either, I don't see the correlation with X and Musk either, as if he is the one developing the platform and not thousand of workers and leaders. What does the CEO of a platform has to do with what people post on it? The CEO of HN is responsible for what you just posted?

Kinda funny how people are selective about it, when you land on a website, you check who is in charge of it and for each CEO change you redo a decision? When you host your Postgres in the cloud, I hope you check as well who is in charge of Railway or Supabase, who knows? :/

▲

spiderfarmer 3 hours ago | parent [-]

There's only thing I find sadder than untouchable billionaires that never see any consequences for their actions: the people who think they need to stick up for them.

> What does the CEO of a platform has to do with what people post on it?

That CEO is actively promoting political viewpoints (via his account, his platform and his AI model) that are detrimental to my country and the way I want to live my life.

> When you land on a website, you check who is in charge of it and for each CEO change you redo a decision?

No. But if the CEO is very publicly a first-class a-hole, chances are I'll hear about it and I'll actively avoid doing business with them. That goes for the car dealership in my village, as well as the websites I interact with.

▲

pixel_popping 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not from the US so I don't really care, X is an international platform and almost all the content I see isn't US related (which kinda make me think that people should just set their account from outside of the US to just avoid this?), but from your point of view, it seems more of a disagreement of beliefs, wouldn't this reasoning apply for your beliefs as well? If the CEO of a certain platform was agreeing with your beliefs but 50% of the population don't, you are practically saying that people disagreering should boycott said platform, but isn't that how you just end discourse between people and create an echo-chamber?

	▲	spiderfarmer 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[dead]

▲

spiderfarmer 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/30/elon-musk...

	▲	pixel_popping 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[flagged]