Good. Now they should also ban themselves from insider trading in both the public stock market and private markets as well as prediction markets.

▲

tt24 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They should do this, but only because senators and congresspeople are terrible at trading stocks and they generally average below SPY.

There’s like 2 famous exceptions, other than those they are simply abysmal traders because their information isn’t worth very much. This problem is so overstated, it’s popular because it’s vaguely populist and exhibits an anti elite sentiment

▲

riotnrrd 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This was done in 2012: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STOCK_Act

	▲	lapetitejort 11 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> A member, officer, or employee of the __Senate__ shall not receive any compensation, nor shall he permit any compensation to accrue to his beneficial interest from any source, the receipt or accrual of which would occur by virtue of influence improperly exerted from his position as a member, officer, or employee. Emphasis mine. This does not cover the judicial or executive branch
	▲	handedness 11 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The STOCK Act mostly only had the effect of creating some inconveniences for lawmakers (e.g., their families could still trade based on their guidance), and even that was only the case for a year as Senator Reid's House bill S.716 effectively gutted the STOCK Act and restored the status quo, was passed by unanimous consent after 14 seconds of discussion, and was signed into law by President Obama: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STOCK_Act#Amendment https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/716

▲

java-man 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

But it's so... profitable!