| ▲ | afavour 7 hours ago | |||||||
To quote the previous post: > I've yet to come up against a download (even a torrent) that seems like it would have really benefitted from having the entire theoretical 1.5 pipe available. There are many things along the way that would get in the way of a home user downloading something from the internet that would hit that 5GB/s speed. It's not that people should be "banned" from it or something, more that the investment cost isn't worth it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | fmajid 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I regularly saturate my 1G home and 1G office connection syncing ~6GB files between the two. It's also nice to be able to download a 100G or so game quickly. Remote backups to cloud storage also benefit from fast upload speeds (and more importantly, restores). | ||||||||
| ▲ | mlyle 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
We have a 5gbps pipe; routinely download games from Steam at >3gbps; when I had to reinitialize my cloud backup it was >4gbps. All of this without impacting anyone else on the pipe. Yah, our P95 bandwidth is just a few megabits per second. But it's not that expensive and routinely saves me a few minutes here and there. 10gbps on the LAN is more broadly useful. Pegging it for a file share is a daily occurrence. | ||||||||
| ||||||||