> State your case, enumerate them.

My case is that Gen II reactors have a design flaw which gives them a risk that should be eliminated. We should replace Gen II reactors with Gen III or later reactors as none of them suffer from the same problems as Gen II reactors do.

The rest of your post is about AP1000, which is a Gen III+ reactor. A fine reactor to replace Gen II reactors with.

I've made this point, to you, a couple of times so now I feel like you aren't actually reading my responses.

I'm not interested in one sided conversations.