No. Hanlon's razor applies here.

b00ty4breakfast 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You lose little by assuming malicious intent when it comes to billion-dollar tech companies and your money. They can prove otherwise by remedying the situation.

▲

tedivm 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

When it comes to understanding large organizations I think a simple principle should apply:

The Purpose of a System is What it Does[1].

Whether malicious or not, the system does what it does. If people wanted it to do something else they would change the system. The reality is that when corporations make mistakes that benefit them those mistakes rarely get fixed without some sort of public outcry, turning the "mistake" into a "feature".

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_wha...

▲

tyg13 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Not really sure you gain much, either. Unless false confidence is your goal.

	▲	b00ty4breakfast an hour ago \| parent [-]
		False confidence in what?

▲

pfortuny 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not to corporations, no. You do not need to be charitable to a corporation.

▲

bryanrasmussen 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

ok, how is this adequately explained by stupidity?

If it is adequately explained by stupidity then you should be able to get it to display the same behavior without mentioning OpenClaw? Do you have any theory as to what stupid thing they have done to make this happen, non-maliciously? Because, Hanlon's razor doesn't just work by saying Hanlon's razor - you have to actually explain how the stupidity happened.

▲

conartist6 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What you do shows what you value. This clearly wasn't a mistake on the part of Anthropic. Time has shown that. They made the call based on what they believe in

▲

grayhatter 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Gross negligence is malicious.

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

michaelmrose 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It does not. I would be fairly magical the most favorable interpretation that makes sense is that its supposed to disconnect but also taking your money is a defect.