> Which Gen II reactors are subject to war, exactly?

Potentially any of them. World governments aren't static. Mitt Romney was literally laughed at for talking about the Russian military threat in 2012.

> two new AP1000

These are Gen III+ reactors, which thoughout this thread I've been saying we should be building to replace the Gen II reactors.

If Ukraine was building new Gen II reactors you might have a point.