| ▲ | MagicMoonlight 2 hours ago |
| Lmao, I can 100% believe that they are deliberately filling your usage bar to sabotage their competition. These people have no morals. |
|
| ▲ | rob 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| "Sorry, that was a bug!" Thariq will be on scene shortly, don't worry. |
| |
| ▲ | nubg an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yeah it will be something like "we A/B tested on 0,05% of users and ..." |
|
|
| ▲ | iLoveOncall 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I mean that also just sounds illegal... |
| |
| ▲ | vile_wretch an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | It also sounds extremely counterproductive to try and sabotage your competition by.. driving your customers away? I have no love for these companies but it's a silly conclusion to jump to. | | |
| ▲ | LoganDark an hour ago | parent [-] | | They don't want customers that make them bleed more money than they're supposed to. | | |
| ▲ | andai an hour ago | parent [-] | | People on OpenClaw discord were bragging about having this stuff running 24/7 and using billions of tokens. I think one guy was using billions per day. (I might have misplaced some zeros but I remember one guy's bill would have been $1000 with API pricing. Per day.) At the time, enforcement was pretty random, and I think based on how heavy your traffic was. They weren't all on Claude (though it was the preferred setup) and some people had dozens of accounts hooked up with proxies to avoid hitting limits. |
|
| |
| ▲ | 2ndorderthought an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not if a chatbot did it, maybe. No legal precedence here. Also they are a defense and offense contractor they could kill people and nothing would happen | |
| ▲ | GolfPopper an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Would they act differently if it was? |
|
