| ▲ | SeanAnderson 3 hours ago | |||||||
I don't think anyone is questioning all the benefits of using local LLMs. Those are readily apparent. I just don't believe for an instant that they're anywhere in the same ballpark of capabilities as running Opus or similar. My time is the most valuable resource. Opus would need to be SIGNIFICANTLY more costly and unstable for me to start entertaining local models for day-to-day development. Perhaps whatever work you're doing makes this trade-off more sensible, but I struggle to see how that could be true. I'm averse to running Sonnet on a large amount of software engineering problems - let alone Qwen. | ||||||||
| ▲ | regexorcist 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I think you'd be surprised, I find that the harness is what makes the real difference. I also prefer to be on the loop, actively guide and review. Local models are definitely much less autonomous as of today so if you need to be churning out code at speed they're probably not for you. | ||||||||
| ▲ | slopinthebag an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
If you know what you're doing and prompt it correctly, local models are great. If you're just vibe coding and relying on the LLM to fill in all the gaps for you and basically build the software for you, yeah you need SOTA to deal with that. | ||||||||
| ▲ | jrm4 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
But, you know, Yet. | ||||||||
| ||||||||