| ▲ | esyir 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
If car manufacturers cannot bring car related deaths to zero, they too should no longer be legitimate companies. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lokar 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
A better comparison would be that if a car company can’t meet preexisting crash/safety standards, they need to shut down. These are pretty clear laws established by a democratic government with a pretty good record for rule of law. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 2ndorderthought 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Do car companies sell cars without air bags, or seat belts? What about cars that haven't been crash tested? What happens to them if they don't do this do you think? Would you drive a car optimized for profit that didn't have those safety features? How about on a highway? Daily? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | _DeadFred_ 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
When FORD dngaf with the Pinto and Corsair( like tech companies do not gaf), they deservedly got this same level of contempt/demand for oversite. A dude named Ralph Nader went on a huge crusade about it. And they got a ton more oversite, safety requirements, etc put on them. So yes, yes, let's do like we did with cars. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||