My poor Reddit has been taken over by bots :(

That obviously won't be true for much longer, assuming it's still true now, which I doubt. If you're an LLM content farmer, how hard could it possibly be to LoRA your way out of generating cliches like emdashes, 'You're absolutely right!' and 'It's not A, but B' rhetoric?

We should probably go ahead and get over it.

I guess my point was lost.

It is obvious, when it is obvious. When it is not, you don't know it.

There are ton more false positives now. Everyone is calling everything 'LLM Slop'.

Because there is a lot of slop. Now every bad human writer is being called an AI just for being human.

And, that is covering that a ton of stuff is LLM and nobody can tell.

People that say they can tell the difference are fooling themselves.

Yes, if you are using a generic LLM.

But you can tell it to use different styles. To be formal or in-formal, to insert colloquialisms or to remove.

People are depending on their own 'gut-sense' a lot, and not realizing they are really not correct.

If you think all it takes is paying attention, then you are missing it. It's both more widely used than assumed, and also now obscuring what is non-AI.

Not the first time this has happened.

Half the articles are now LLM's.

If he didn't admit it, we'd be arguing over 'style', which itself can be configured.

Prompt> LLM don't use em-dash.

LLM> OK.

> a piece that is both long and highly polished while being devoid of useful information

Idk, I learned a little bit about our regulatory system, that a lot of these labs are in China and that those are now banned (and that the ones in India may be next).

The style is admittedly annoying. But I'm glad the author put in the work to highlight something they, and now I through them, found interesting.

No human would waste the time to write a piece that is both highly polished while being so long that any useful information is spread so thinly it is essentially empty.

LOL, some of us spent 12 years in public schools refining this very art to perfection.

The content of the site is, as stated in my first comment and in the article itself, a nice looking wrapper on top of in essence, an llm Wiki that I put together with the help of Claude on the hardware certification universe. While I was building this data set out, I uncovered that the FCC had this vote today, so I thought it would be a good thing to share since it's timely and because I had just collected all of the relevant information tolp someone figure out how this impacts their hardware certification process (I use voice transcription to write this comment)

I very much appreciate your feedback. As I look at the article now. I totally see what you're saying. I should have let off what was going on with the vote today since that's what I referenced in the title of the post on here.

Well I couldn't find any other thorough dataset on this topic, so in that sense this is non-obvious since it took weeks to assemble the information. And it was fun doing it using the LLM Wiki technique.