Because person wearing glasses usually can move and video surveillance cameras usually can't? If that's not it then spell it out for me, please. Also, why would i be deceptive in this discussion? I feel like I missed some ideological conflict.

▲

intended 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Imagine someone pulling up a smartphone and then recording everything that happens around them. Contrast that with someone wearing smart glasses and doing that exact same thing.

On a separate note, (and this is a genuine question) are you by any chance aware the term Non-consensual intimate imagery / NCII?

I am beginning to suspect that the average HN goer isn’t aware of the scope and scale of the Trust and Safety problem.

▲

throwmeaway888 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Have you heard the term non consensual intimate fantasies? I've heard it's an even bigger problem.

	▲	intended 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Well, you would fortunately be wrong. Fantasies are commonplace and well studied in society, psychology and even in the law. The issue is when you go from fantasy to actually enacting it, which is usually when you earn the epithet of “Creep”. Also, why make a throwaway for this line? I take it you haven’t heard of NCII?

▲

salawat 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They don't care. Or they refuse to realize that tech isn't the solution to it, but an amplifier of it's scale.

Can tell you that my urge to take photos/record drastically dips around other people. Particularly if it were meant for any sort of commercial exploitation. Stephenson called people wired for max indiscriminate data collection/processing "gargoyles". Personally I prefer glassholes.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-borg-of...

	▲	arowthway 2 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I admit it's hard to care for what you people can't even articulate