What specifically do you mean? It is by design that smart glasses see the things happening in front of their users? Yes, it is. That is why people buy them.

▲

OutOfHere 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Huh. There you go again, thinking everyone else is an idiot. Capture of video data of users by Meta is never acceptable. It would not be acceptable for any phone, and it is not acceptable for any glass, ever.

▲

fibonacci_man 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Saving the data for any purpose other than allowing users to access it is bad enough; allowing Meta employees or contractors to view personal videos is on a whole new level.

▲

getnormality 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't know why people buy smart glasses. Maybe they buy them for video capture. If so, the videos go to Meta's servers and Meta might do things with them. They might be criticized for not reviewing them in certain cases. That's one reason why I wouldn't buy Meta smart glasses.

▲

3form 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If only we had the technology to record video without sending it to Meta's servers.

	▲	4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

expedition32 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Main character syndrome? Lots of people seem to act like they are in a 24/7 live stream with 50 million followers.

▲

ImPostingOnHN 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The main issue here is Facebook employees viewing users' private video streams (including of user nudity) without the users' knowledge.

The secondary issue is that it's generally frowned upon to make your employees view nudity in the workplace. Are there extenuating circumstances here? No, we have no evidence there are any extenuating circumstances here.