Not sure which is worse here - that Meta are recording video from customers' smart glasses, or that they are firing people who talk about it.

The latter, as they can't even claim to have done so by accident, or "it was just bug".

OutOfHere 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Everything having to do with Meta, starting with its very name, has been evil from the start.

Can I squeeze in the just a teeny tiny bit of… why the hell are you wearing an internet camera on you while naked and/or having sex?

… although I really extend that to why are you wearing an internet connected camera that is obviously going to be monitored by Meta.

	▲	embedding-shape 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		So already, this person wearing these glasses are already agree with that Meta can monitor them. They also probably trust Meta when they say "When the glasses are off, nothing is recording", for better or worse. So with that perspective in mind, it's not far fetched to assume these same people will willingly be naked into front of these recording devices they believe to be off. Of course, anyone who opened a newspaper in the last 10 years or so would know better, but I can definitively see some people not giving a fuck about it.
	▲	Tangurena2 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		There are "content creators" who intentionally record people without any sort of consent. At least when they point cameras, one can notice the cameras and take action. With these sorts of glasses, no one in view has consented, nor have they agreed to any sort of terms & conditions. I never understood the appeal of upskirt pictures. But I think that taking videos of non-consenting participants/victims is the current version of the upskirt photo craze.
	▲	sunaookami 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		The Ray-Ban stays ON during sex!
	▲	3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]