It's more about curating the things you're publishing. Why would I bother reading what you couldn't bother to read?

They could easily have read it, and thought , that communicates the information that it needs to.

No point creating busywork for yourself just shuffling words around when the information is there, no?

I guess it depends on what you want out of the article. Substance, or style?

	▲	lelanthran 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		> They could easily have read it, and thought , that communicates the information that it needs to. I'd they aren't self-aware enough or smart enough to determine that what they wrote is indistinguishable from text generation, how probable is it that they have something of value to add to any thought?