Are you saying this because it's an evergreen joke or because you really think there hasn't been meaningful progress in the field since 1996?

Duke Nukem Forever was release fifteen years ago. Some things never happen until they suddenly do.

The wolf really does eat the boy at the end of The Boy Who Cried Wolf.

▲

emil-lp 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

But Duke Nukem was developed with visible progress.

We are still not factoring 21, let alone 35, let alone numbers with thousands of digits.

▲

red75prime 2 days ago | parent [-]

Quantum correction algorithms (that would allow factoring of thousands of digits) begin to work when the gate fidelity and other parameters are above certain threshold.

▲

AndrewStephens 2 days ago | parent [-]

> gate fidelity and other parameters are above certain threshold

A threshold that might be beyond what the physical properties of our universe allow. It is still unclear.

▲

red75prime 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

This possibility means discovery of new physics that has no indications of existence yet.

▲

antonvs 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

This is what bugs me about both quantum computers and commercial fusion power. There's so much talk about how it's just inevitable and will happen soonish, but a lot of the evidence suggests, in some cases strongly, that it might not ever be possible.

I find it weird how bleeding edge research, at the very edges of both physics and engineering, is treated as though it's a market development about to drop. Possibly a consequence of pure R&D having all but died? Getting funded requires pretending there's a business plan for what you're working on?

▲

red75prime 2 days ago | parent [-]

There's no strong evidence of impossibility. For quantum computers to be impossible at scale we need new unknown physics. Fusion requires lots of engineering. And before those engineering efforts would show practical impossibility or impracticality, there can't be strong evidence.

	▲	antonvs 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		By not ever be possible, I mean in a practical sense, including e.g. the economics of it, as well as reliability, checkability, etc. Jassby's article about fusion (https://thebulletin.org/2017/04/fusion-reactors-not-what-the...) describes several well-understood issues that could prevent commercial fusion power from ever being practically possible. For quantum computers, the situation is quite similar. Michel Dyakonov and several others have laid out the situation well. At least we don't have anyone claiming that interstellar travel is just 10 years away, yet. Probably because it's more difficult to make an economic case for it. But the issues are quite similar. In principle, in terms of physics, nothing prevents an interstellar journey. In practice, it just isn't going to happen.

▲

watwut 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The Boy Who Cried Wolf is a story about a boy who have seen a wolf, successfully threatened the wolf away by causing a commotion in a disbelieving village. One day the disbelieving village refused to show up, boy was eaten and thus proven correct.

But as it happens in real life politics too, people who were just proven they were wrong continued to blame the boy.

The story is told from the point of view of a villagers trying to hide their culpability by blaming the victim.

▲

missingdays 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

That's one way to completely reframe the story to fit the narrative you want to push

	▲	2 days ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

jrflowers 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> The Boy Who Cried Wolf is a story about a boy who have seen a wolf, successfully threatened the wolf away by causing a commotion in a disbelieving village

What happened before that in the story