The article explains Zig's stance in further detail, but the quoted part on its own caught my attention because my reading of it is rather "pro human communication" instead of "anti-AI".

▲

kennykartman 2 hours ago | parent [-]

They're banning all AI though, so it looks pretty much anti-AI to me.

▲

pjjpo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I wonder - has it been confirmed that no LLMs for PRs literally means no AI assistance for code?

While I haven't codified it anywhere, the policy I would like is for issues and PR descriptions to have no LLMs - there is no reason to ban code completely though IMO. I would say that would be pro human-communication and a stance I would like a lot.

▲

dakolli an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Good, pro AI people produce poor quality in everything they do. They are the least creative and worst problem solvers. I don't want them near me or my work.

	▲	SuperV1234 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Your whole schtick, judging by your dozens of comments, is a sense of superiority over pro-AI people and LLMs. I'm willing to bet I produce higher quality code than you with AI assistance.