| ▲ | dzhiurgis 8 hours ago | |||||||
What problem would a hybrid solve for military? Military doesn't care about emissions and this doesn't offer resilience like fully electric does (recharge anywhere, reliability). | ||||||||
| ▲ | amluto 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The same problem that a hybrid architecture solves for ships: the ability to use physically small electric motors with very high power density that are mechanically decoupled from the rest of the vehicle. This lets a bunch of designs pull off neat thrust vectoring tricky with much simpler and lighter components than a mechanical thrust vectoring system would need. (Electric azimuth thrusters are becoming common in large ships for roughly this reason, too.) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | nradov 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The military cares a lot about range, signature reduction, and especially fuel efficiency. Reducing fuel usage reduces the logistical train necessary to sustain units in the field. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2025/01/22/army-tries-out-n... | ||||||||
| ||||||||