You are confused by the human genome project vs the celera genome project. No, the human genome project didn't include his sample.

▲

mbreese 8 hours ago | parent [-]

It gets a little fuzzy when talking about Celera and the human genome project. The two efforts were very much competitors, but there was a lot of crossover (mainly from Celera pulling in the public data).

But, Venter claimed that he was the a good chunk of the genome that Celera sequenced, so I think it's fair to say he was one of the people included in the draft human genome (at least the Celera version of it).

> After leaving Celera in 2002, Venter announced that much of the genome that had been sequenced there was his own. [1]

[1] https://www.technologyreview.com/2007/09/04/223919/craig-ven...

▲

acmj 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I am not sure what is "the draft human genome" you are talking about. Two separate human genomes were published in 2001: the HGP genome and the celera genome. The HGP genome then didn't use Venter DNA. It evolved into the current human reference genome. The celera genome contained Venter DNA but it has been completely forgotten nowadays.

	▲	eweitz 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Yes. For folks looking for more: * Celera genome, first published 2004: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_000002115.1... * Human reference genome, first published 2001 and most recently updated in 2022: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_000001405.4...
	▲	3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]