| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | |
I still can’t believe that people take Caveman seriously. It’s a funny joke, but saving a couple hundred tokens in the final output is going to be negligible, especially when coding where it’s common to go through hundreds of thousands of tokens in a session. You also have to consider the additional tokens consumed by the skill itself (acknowledging that output tokens are billed at a different rate). I got a kick out of it when it was released, but now that I’m seeing it repeated as a useful operation it’s apparent how much cargo culting is going on in this space. | ||
| ▲ | nomel an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
I like it when people make conclusions with data, rather than emotion. It's good someone benchmarked it. | ||
| ▲ | antonvs an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> I still can’t believe that people take Caveman seriously. I treat it as a criterion for people who shouldn’t be taken seriously. We have a few at our company. None of them are actually software developers, thankfully. | ||