>I cannot see any reason, over than oversight and a lack of imagination, why something useful in Ukraine in 2022 was not feasible or useful in 2017 by the USA.

Perhaps it had to do with optics? It's not like there was a lack of capability in 2017. [0]

The war in Ukraine provided a way for the US to assist in rapid iteration of the technology without having to shoulder the negative sentiment or grapple with the morality of it.

Also worth noting that the two conflicts were wildly different: Afghanistan was more of an occupation across a much larger area with air superiority. There's not really much impetus to field killer drone swarms when you already have the 24/7 ability to instantly delete most enemy combatants off the map to begin with.

Whereas Ukraine with neither side having air superiority and it resembling something closer to modern trench warfare. In most cases with literal trenches.

>We already used drones quite handily well before that time frame but in a much more limited manner in a different form factor.

The picture below is from 1995. [1]

By approximately 2001 it received the MQ-1A designation indicating it was capable of employing AGM-114 (hellfire) payloads. Kind of crazy to think about.

[0] https://www.twz.com/6866/60-minutes-does-an-infomercial-on-d...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomics_MQ-1_Predator#...