Do you have a standard and a body of work you can point to in an effort to aid with communication these thoughts to others? At the very least there should be a reversible projection to the Big 5 standard.

▲

js8 2 days ago | parent [-]

I don't think Big5 applies to LLMs. They don't share people's morality or common sense, and the traits are predicated on that.

BTW: https://claude.ai/share/78a13035-0787-42a5-8643-398b26887e42

▲

cjbgkagh 2 days ago | parent [-]

Lol, you convinced a LLM to agree with you. I use the Big5 as a way of communicating where there is a common reference and a large body of work. How people think they think and how they actually think are two different things, people are much closer to LLMs than they think they are. I can't provide evidence for this for a variety of reasons so at this point we're just going to have to agree to disagree.

▲

js8 a day ago | parent [-]

Actually, it's the other way around - I used LLM to think about it independently to check if my intuition made sense.

I agree with its arguments (and I generally found LLMs argue better than myself, that's why I use them).

It's disappointing that you dismiss it without providing a counterargument.

	▲	cjbgkagh 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I have privileged access to information that I cannot share, I would rather keep my access than win some argument online.