| ▲ | Lorin 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
What is the rationale behind naming CVEs and individual domains? Marketing? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | diath 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's an advertisement for their tool that found the exploit: https://copy.fail/#contact, https://xint.io/products/xint-code | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | john_strinlai 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
can you remember what CVE-2021-44228 is without looking it up? CVE-2014-6271? CVE-2017-5753? i bet if i told you their names, you would instantly know what vulns those are. its easier to talk about things with names. it hurts no one. it takes approximately no effort or time. CVEs are, for whatever reason, like the only thing on the planet that people seem to have a problem with when they receive a name. i am not sure why. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | evanjrowley 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The AI generated prose screams marketing. Marketing is why there's a "Contact our Security Team" form at the bottom of the page. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | skilled 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Probably to some extent it is marketing, but generally it has to do with significant bug finds to get the message out to the people who need to apply patches and/or be informed. Heartbleed, Log4Shell, etc. Very few CVE’s get names dedicated to them like this, because usually when they do - it is very serious, as in this case. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tptacek 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's certainly marketing, but it's prosocial: there's no scarcity of names, and "copy.fail" is much easier to remember and talk about than "CVE-2026-31431". | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | eddythompson80 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Giving catchy names for bad exploits has been a thing for a while. Probably to make sure it's easy to reference and make sure you're patches as opposed to passing numbers around. Heartbleed, Shellshock, BEAST, Goto Fail, etc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dgellow 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, originally it was to help spread awareness. Now it has become more of a gimmick I would say | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ronsor 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It makes sure people don't forget about the vulnerabilities, at least | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Fuzzbit 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Same reason they name storms, numbers scare normies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||