I was hoping a lot from it... but this one, is not up to that mark. For example, here is it's comparion with 4.7x smaller model, qwen3.7-27b.

Tldr: qwen3.6-27b, a 4.7x smaller model, have similar performance.

r0b05 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's a chatgpt summary. Actual usage would a better test.

	▲	freakynit 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		yep.. until then, this is good enough since the tests are standard, and the results are numeric and can be compared without any doubt.

lostmsu 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

To be fair MoE from Qwen itself had the same "problem". 3.5 122B MoE was same or worse than 3.5 27B. Yet to see 122B 3.6.

UPD. NVM, Mistral Medium 3.5 is dense. So yes, it is worse in every way.