They explained in detail why they felt they had to talk about it. They think there's no safe deployment strategy other than fixing all the vulnerabilities it's likely to find, and there are too many such vulnerabilities for them to fix without getting help from a substantial number of trusted partners.

▲

b00ty4breakfast a day ago | parent [-]

All due respect, that's the biggest crock I've ever heard in my life.

▲

SpicyLemonZest a day ago | parent [-]

I understand where you're coming from. I can imagine myself reacting similarly if HP announced that they've invented a printer so powerful that it can print documents you don't have access to. But I don't know how to engage with this response, other than to say that Anthropic's story is plausible to me and everyone I know in either AI or security.

▲

habinero a day ago | parent [-]

I work in security, and I think it's marketing BS meant to drive FOMO until proven otherwise.

You cannot take any claims from these people seriously, they lie constantly.

▲

DANmode a day ago | parent [-]

> I work in security

Doing what? School admins work in security.

▲

habinero 20 hours ago | parent [-]

Your mom, primarily.

Also general blue team shit and appsec.

▲

DANmode 20 hours ago | parent [-]

lol.

Aren’t you convinced by the posts by security researchers (and more to the point, non-security-researchers) claiming semiautonomous (or better) 0day discovery with these tools?

Haven’t seen enough of them?

Help me understand.

	▲	habinero 16 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Why? I'm clearly not going to convince you lol. You convince me I should.