Ok, so those bills in NY and WA about making it illegal to sell printers that don't detect firearm parts are dead in the water, right?

▲

bluGill 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Those are different circuit courts where this ruling doesn't directly apply. However anyone who wants to challenge those laws would be stupid to not bring this to the judge - even though it doesn't apply, the judge still needs to justify why they are ignoring it and on appeal the circuit court will mention this ruling (either why they agree, or why they think it is wrong) - assuming the appeal is accepted.

▲

jmward01 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It will be fine to print a gun but there will be laws outlawing your ability to print an iphone case and printers will have to detect parts from any registered manufacturer. So we will get the worst of all worlds. printers only for guns and not for people to build useful things.

▲

dabluecaboose 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Unjustified cynicism aside, the same technical reasons that a ban on printing gun parts is infeasible apply to printing iphone cases. There's no feasible way to detect what a printer is printing.

▲

autoexec 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Don't underestimate the state's ability to spy on what you (and your devices) are doing or their willingness to erode your freedom even with massive false positive/negative rates.

	▲	dabluecaboose 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Fine, there's currently no feasible way to do that

▲

mghackerlady 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I very much wouldn't put it past this government from banning unauthorised part printing in some draconian DMCA-esque law bought and paid for by John Deere and Apple, but is there any current proposals for such a law?

▲

AnimalMuppet 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You just need a gun design that has a part that can double as an iphone case...

	▲	chroma 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You joke but phone mounts for firearms are a thing. People use them to record gun PoV videos and to make range estimation (such as dope charts) more accessible.

▲

yieldcrv 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

my bet it is that it only affects the states in the 10th circuit, but could be assumed to be the law of the land, until a case is brought in which case there is only an issue if a different appeals circuit rules differently

▲

rtkwe 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Correct, it's only /binding/ on courts in the same District but they are often persuasive when cited in other districts if the decision is well reasoned and less controversial. This one will likely be contested, the circuits have very different ideas about gun rights.

	▲	ApolloFortyNine 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If even the district court rules this way it's hard to see a World where the supreme court doesn't also rule that way. Unless there's been court packing by then of course.