| ▲ | alper 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
I'm afraid that atproto will suffer from Bluesky's irrelevance. Not sure if that's a valid fear. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Certhas 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
In what sense is bluesky irrelevant in this context? It's obviously not Twitter scale, but no alternative to GitHub will be GitHub scale for a long time to come either... And it does seem to have the right feature set. Not sure which other social graph/network you could reasonably build a GitHub alternative around that would be less irrelevant.... | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | FatFingers23 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Fair enough! We are a pretty small ecosystem all in all. I will say in Tangled's case their infrastructure is separate from Bluesky's for the most part, and the rest can be switched easily enough if ever needed. One example is if you don't care anything about atproto, you can create a new account on Tangled's website that creates the account on their servers, but thanks to how atproto works it's just like you made one on Bluesky and can still interact with Tangled and everyone on the protocol for it's social features. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | graybeardhacker 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Everything is irrelevant until it isn't. Then it isn't until it is. If we all do our part, X will become irrelevant. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mikey_p an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
We're not discussing social networks though, this is about Git project hosting. Bluesky doesn't have to compete with Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok or any of that for Tangled to be useful. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 0x457 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
atproto will suffer from centralization via Bluesky and its user wanting it to be centralized. | |||||||||||||||||