| ▲ | qsera 6 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is interesting. Is the job of a leader (or the administration) to foresee threats before anyone else can see it coming? Is their job to make sure that it does not manifest? It is interesting that when they does it, the majority is against it, precisely because no one else could see it and can agree with the action of the administration? So it seems that if someone is a very good leader, they will be ridiculed by the very people they are trying to protect. I think this happens if the unit in question is a family, or a country. I am not picking sides in the on going crisis. But just making an observation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | howmayiannoyyou 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exactly. - Many cannot accept its dangerous world. - Many don't understand that stewardship of nuclear weapons alone is a major undertaking that Iran cannot be trusted to manage. US & USSR alone has several near-miss detonations/launches. - Many will refuse to accept solely because 'orange man bad'. - Some are paid to criticize on influential online forums and HN makes no effort to moderate or police such activity. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||