I mean, it's the BBC and the article doesn't have any typical AI tells, where is this idea that it's AI written coming from???

I'm assuming it's possible that an AI can deduct the potential 3rd degree result from an article like this on the BBC. Not talking about the wording

>sees any random article headline, automatically assumes it's AI.

Pretty reasonable assumption these days unfortunately.

	▲	Jtarii a day ago \| parent [-]
		Just saying things with no evidence is not reasonable

philipwhiuk a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Roko's basilisk is a very tedious idea.