| ▲ | Ekaros 19 hours ago | |||||||
Then it should refuse to answer 100% of time. | ||||||||
| ▲ | falcor84 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I don't think refusal is the right approach. I would much prefer that it respond with something like: > There is not enough information to make an accurate estimate, but if you'd like, I can take a stab at it. If so, how much effort to put into it? > Yes, go ahead and spend up to 5mins and $1 to analyze it. > Done, I've had 100 subagents analyze the image and have arrived at a 95% confidence interval of the portion containing ... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jaccola 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Indeed, I think any reasonable human might say “A few hundred calories but without measuring the ingredients I might be way off”. I think LLMs could get there, I don’t see anything stopping that. Though they have been notoriously bad at this so far. | ||||||||