| ▲ | amazingamazing 19 hours ago | |||||||
With mass information you could infer much more from pictures. With some sort of standard cube in the picture as well as taking a picture at an angle that emphasizes all three dimensions you could also better estimate the relative volume. It’s tractable I think, but not from a pic alone. | ||||||||
| ▲ | jaccola 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Yes one could potentially increase accuracy greatly. One big problem would be occlusion. There is already a solution to this that would be very hard to beat (and one can choose to use or not use an LLM to assist): prepare food yourself and use the information provided by the manufacturer. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | Centigonal 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
maybe, but not always. I could make two identical-looking sandwiches with very different calorie content by changing the type and quantity of sauce on the inside of the bread. I could give you two "pasta with creamy sauce" dishes that look similar on camera but have different macros by partially swapping Greek yogurt for heavy cream. Dropping a couple tbsp olive oil into my marinara sauce does wonders for flavor but barely affects appearance when plated. Same with lard in my refried beans. | ||||||||