If your introduction message already includes a bunch of uncurated claims and LLM smells, then what does that say about the code I'm about to run?

▲

hugocorreia90 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, fair pushback, and yes the intro was AI-assisted. Marketing is not my strength nor I am a native english speaker. I built this in about a month with heavy LLM tooling and the seed comment is part of that. I'm not going to pretend otherwise.

The code is what it is. `cargo test --workspace` runs across 19 crates. CI on 5 platforms (macOS ARM/Intel, Linux x86/ARM, Windows). JSON output schemas are codegen-checked in CI so docs can't drift from the binary.

If you want to skip the marketing copy and look at engine reasoning instead: PR #240 (audit trail), #241 (column classification + masking), #270 (failed-source surfacing in discover).

I'd rather hear "the code is bad" than "the post sounds AI-written".

▲

DoctorOW 35 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> I'd rather hear "the code is bad" than "the post sounds AI-written".

Of course you would. Reading through and judging the quality of AI output is the largest amount of effort in a world where you can get everything else by prompting. Please internalize this: If you want to be respected you will have to put in effort yourself. There is no way around this.

▲

austinthetaco an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This comment itself is likely written by AI by the sounds of it. It may be worth your time writing it out in your own words in your native language and then finding a competent translation tool to translate your words.

▲

FrustratedMonky an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Not sure why you are downvoted here.

'A-Lot' of side projects, hobby projects, etc.. are all using AI tools now. Also for marketing, every sales/marketing firm is using AI. So why critisize this guy inparticular.

AI is pervasive, the train has left the station. So that is not a reason to criticize this project. There might be other reasons, I'm not sure, but not that an AI was used.

▲

ModernMech an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Because "Yeah, fair pushback" is AI smell. Either everything this person does is passed through an AI from code to blogs to even their HN comments and submissions; or they use AI so much they're starting to talk like it colloquially. Either way no one has time for that.

▲

FrustratedMonky an hour ago | parent [-]

"Yeah, fair pushback"

Really hard to tell. Because that used to be a common phrase that real people would use.

So now I have to change my own language in order to not appear like I'm an AI? We are getting in a weird place where Humans have to act/sound increasingly 'odd', to appear not 'perfect' like an AI.

	▲	ModernMech 38 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It's really not hard to tell. It's the "How do you do fellow kids" of AI-isms. The presence of "fair pushback" and a single em dash reads as 99% AI generated as far as I am concerned. Yes, if you don't want to sound like you're cargo culting AI, you do have to change the way you talk because people aren't going to care otherwise. At the very least just because it's boring. That's always been the nature of slang and lingo.

▲

cmrdporcupine an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

It's really a weird world now.

I do think the author is doing a disservice to themselves by writing the post and comments using LLM, even if the code is mostly agent built. People can tell right away, all the LLM shibboleths are there... it feels cheap. Just write naturally and then Google translate, don't let the LLM speak on your behalf.

What's going to distinguish projects that are built this way is the ability to explain, document, support, and maintain said projects over the long term. That will be the crucible. Gone are the days of "build it and they will come", and I feel a bit sad about that.

It's so easy to let the code grow under you beyond what you have the capacity to do the above for.

I've got the same thing going on. Eschewing paid work and grinding 16, 17 hours a day boiling the sea to build the whole universe from scratch (also a database, but of a different sort than this project) integrating all my favourite DB research papers and ideas that I've accumulated over the last 30 years. Outperforms postgres 2-4x or more, has a battery of correctness tests, Lean proofs, benchmarks, etc. etc.

But frankly I'd be nervous to share. Especially here. I don't even know where it ends up. Not least because if I'm doing it, so are 50 other people, probably.

	▲	hugocorreia90 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I totally acknowledge that. The only reason for passing my replies through AI was just because it's my first time posting here and opening a side-project of mine publicly. All the engine architecture decisions are mine though and this project came up to solve a real problem I currently have at work with a zero-touch data pipeline leveraging FiveTran, Dagster, dbt and Databricks. This is a data pipeline that servers multiple agencies and data producers who work with data from more than 300 clients and multiple connectors. Rocky essentially was built based on all the time spent awaken at night thinking about all these problems and how could they be addressed differently, considering that dbt is not suiting well this particular use-case. I decided to open Rocky to public for free because of two simple reasons: 1st is that it might help others and I fullfill my ego of having built something other people like and use. 2nd is that I'm the solo maintainer. A project can only get proper traction if more people contributes to it.