| ▲ | pepperoni_pizza 12 hours ago | |
The way they do renewables in some places: * solar with no storage * shutting down existing nuclear * natural gas peaker plants * making everyone to use natural gas for heating by making it much cheaper than electricity * slowing down the EV rollout by keeping to subsidize gas and diesel could definitely be seen as a scheme to make the fossil fuel gravy train last as long as possible. And that's not even talking about the absolutely out there schemes that didn't succeed like hydrogen powered vehicles (with most of hydrogen coming from fossil fuels and you can theoretically switch to zero emission one but you never would have because the fossil one is always going to be cheaper because making hydrogen is difficult). But it could also all just be incompetence. | ||
| ▲ | ragebol 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
All true, but that does not create a fossil fuel dependency, it just prolongs an already existing one. | ||
| ▲ | mcv 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Gas for heating used to be the standard but is on its way out now. My house hasn't had a gas connection for 8 years, and many people qre switching to heat pumps and other cleaner methods of heating. | ||
| ▲ | mcphage 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> The way they do renewables in some places: > * making everyone to use natural gas for heating by making it much cheaper than electricity They do renewables in some places by selling cheap fossil fuels? That’s… not doing renewables. | ||