well where do YOU draw the line then?

One side openly tries to do maximum death on everyone including infants (eg. fire random missiles, intifada, and the oct 7th attack)

The other side at least tried their best NOT to attack back (expensive missile defense systems) or at least kill only the militants selectively (walkietalkie boomboom)

I mean, you should be ashamed of even comparing israel vs iran/hamas/etc

▲

watwut 5 hours ago | parent [-]

> One side openly tries to do maximum death on everyone including infants

That would be israel with special focus on journalists and doctors

> The other side at least tried their best NOT to attack back

As idiotic as it is, Iran shown more restraint then Israel and USA against other countries. Internaly not, but ouyside yes. They played tit for tat.

	▲	sysguest 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Iran shown more restraint then Israel and USA against other countries > They played tit for tat. like... firing missiles at UAE...? launching drone to dubai tower? did India do anything to iran to get its ships fired upon? blocking hormuz strait... that alone was enough to trigger global coalition -- though due to Trump's trade dick move to allies... no one sent troops... if it's "tit for tat", then why does iran make so many un-related countries suffer (eg india?) well simple: iran is the new pirate of 21st century. nothing more or less. if anyone says "that's because US attacked", then if I got hit by a car, can I have my revenge on nearby pedestrians?