|
| ▲ | riffraff an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| I had the impression it was AI writing too because of the second half of the article. The first part looks genuine, the part since "trust laundering" smells fake: the scary single sentence followed by a whole paragraph of single clause sentences hints at AI. Perhaps we've all just become paranoid, but even if it's not LLMs writing this, it now puts me off. And the AI image at the top of the page does not help with the feeling. |
|
| ▲ | chneu 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Agreed. Nothing about this post really stood out as AI. It didn't raise a single flag for me. I think calling something AI generated is just a lazy way of dismissing stuff nowadays. |
|
| ▲ | malfist 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Why is agents (where the money is)? Fake profundity is abound in the post |
| |
| ▲ | esquivalience 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The author has been using parenthetical comments like that since at least 2017, judging by a review of old posts on that site. |
|
